This is Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality—my attempt to make myself, and all of you out there in SubStackLand, smarter by writing where I have Value Above Replacement and shutting up where I do not… Yes, the "New York Times" Has Really Weird Cultural Coverage. Why Do You Ask?As an institution, it seems that it really does not like that my cousin Phil Lord and his partner Chris Miller keep making movies that push back against the beliefs that the audience is dumb and...As an institution, it seems that it really does not like that my cousin Phil Lord and his partner Chris Miller keep making movies that push back against the beliefs that the audience is dumb and the world is doomed. The Project Hail Mary looks like a space opera, but its real subject is the politics of competence. Lord and Miller and Gosling are smuggling an argument about process, improvisation, and friendship into the Hollywood-&-media IP-industrial complex…A nice interview <https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/20/movies/project-hail-mary-phil-lord-christopher-miller.html> of my cousin Phil Lord and his partner Chris Miller about the extraordinarily good and successful Project Hail Mary movie, on which they are team leads! Some highlights:
The movie at $140 million has (what I am informed is) tied with Oppenheimer as the largest nominal non-sequwe non-franchise movie opening weekend ever. The movie looks to have only a -35% dropoff from weekend 1 to weekend 2 (for blockbusters and front-loaded fanboy titles, a -60% dropoff is routine, a -50% dropoff is strong, and a -40% dropoff exceptionally good, or so I am told). The movie that has a 95%-favorable critic and a 96%-favorable audience rating on <http://rottentomatoes.com>: It is so favorable a take that I would call it a full-fledged beat sweetener, except for one thing, two things actually: the article’s title and subtitle. It’s not “Chris Miller and Phil Lord Direct Ryan Gosling in the Closest Thing to a One-Man Show Blockbuster There Will Ever Be”. It’s not “Chris Miller and Phil Lord Reflect on Directing Their Hit Project Hail Mary”. It’s not “Making a Faceless Alien Sing: Lord and Miller on the Impossible Challenges of Project Hail Mary”. It’s not “Inside Project Hail Mary: Process, Puppets, and the Messiness of Space”. It’s not “Turning Doom Into Hope: The Directors of ‘Project Hail Mary’ on Friendship, Science, and Survival”. It’s not From Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs to Project Hail Mary: Lord and Miller’s Obsession With Projects That Shouldn’t Work. Instead, it’s:
Huh!?!? I have thoughts. But I find myself annoyed enough that it would probably be wise to put them below the fold, while I take some time to decide on whether they are properly reasoned or not. But I do feel I should note that there is a backstory here—a backstory here that might explain why the title and subhead of the article strike me as so really, really weird. The New York Times gave the baton to review my cousin Phil Lord and the Team’s Project Hail Mary review to Manohla Dargis. She then set out maxxnegging it:... Continue reading this post for free in the Substack app |
Yes, the "New York Times" Has Really Weird Cultural Coverage. Why Do You Ask?
Saturday, 28 March 2026
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





No comments:
Post a Comment