It was such a huge mistake in 2021 not to expand the Supreme Court. The lawless Republican justices had already said who they were: lawless partisan hypocrites. And yet Manchin and company would...
͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
| | |
| This is Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality—my attempt to make myself, and all of you out there in SubStackLand, smarter by writing where I have Value Above Replacement and shutting up where I do not…
It was such a huge mistake in 2021 not to expand the Supreme Court. The lawless Republican justices had already said who they were: lawless partisan hypocrites. And yet Manchin and company would not listen. That may have been one of the key failures that future historians will say ended American democracy as we had known it…Share
Unexplained lawlessness at the Supreme Court continues. The ruling principle is now: Trump wins rapidly when he cares enough to double-down on the issue, except in the case of the Federal Reserve, where he does not win rapidly, but we will not say anything more than that: Steve Vladeck: <https://bsky.app/profile/stevevladeck.bsky.social/post/3m25bwr237224>: ‘#BREAKING: #SCOTUS punts in the Lisa Cook case, deferring resolution of Trump’s emergency application seeking to remove Cook from the Federal Reserve Board pending argument on the application in January 2026: One word of caution to those viewing this as a big win for Cook: This will be the fifth argument #SCOTUS has heard on an application since 1971; in each of the previous four (all since 2022), the applicant *won.* Letting Cook keep her job for now won’t stop the Court from ruling against her later. To be clear, this is a much better sign for Cook than we’ve seen in any of the *other* removal cases. But the notion that letting her stay on the Board for now necessarily defeats the government’s irreparable harm argument is belied by the Court’s behavior in, e.g., the birthright citizenship cases…. This isn’t a grant of relief. So far, this is following the same path as the birthright citizenship cases. And we know how those ended…
Leave a comment How is this different from any of the other removal cases. It isn’t. A Supreme Court that was an umpire—that called balls and strikes—would say: in all removal cases Trump’s dismissals are properly enjoined, because Humphrey’s Executor is good law right now, and whatever you think of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court’s power to rule and make and unmake law from the bench, that making and unmaking has not yet happened, and so does not cast a shadow backward in time to the present. Give a gift subscription If reading this gets you Value Above Replacement, then become a free subscriber to this newsletter. And forward it! And if your VAR from this newsletter is in the three digits or more each year, please become a paid subscriber! I am trying to make you readers—and myself—smarter. Please tell me if I succeed, or how I fail…
#lisa-cook
#neofascism
#deeply-corrupt-supreme-court
#lisa-cook-is-not-yet-evicted-from-the-federal-reserve-boardPlease forward the email & otherwise share it to everyone you think would appreciate it… Share | |
No comments:
Post a Comment