UK, EU and Canada decided to stop Trump’s peace plan for UkrainePeace plan for Ukraine attributed to Donald Trump, announced on March 2, 2025, involving increased military aid, sanctions on Russia, and a commitment to arm Ukraine post-peace deal.
The UK’s commitment to Ukraine—where virtue-signalling meets an open chequebook. If you thought Keir Starmer's government had its priorities sorted—perhaps tackling the cost-of-living crisis, fixing the crumbling NHS, or maybe just keeping the lights on—you'd be mistaken. No, instead, the Prime Minister has enthusiastically doubled down on funding a war with no clear end, throwing billions at Ukraine like a drunk aristocrat at a casino, all while telling the British public that it's in their best interest. So, let’s take a deep dive into how Britain, under the ever-so-principled leadership of Starmer, is positioning itself as the world’s most eager warmonger, all while pretending to stand for "peace and security." Military Support: Guns Before Butter, ObviouslyNothing screams "responsible governance" like a £3 billion annual pledge to a foreign conflict with no exit strategy. But Starmer, ever the statesman, has gone one better: on March 2, 2025, he proudly announced an additional £1.6 billion in UK export finance so Ukraine can buy more than 5,000 missiles—because clearly, 400 types of military equipment just weren’t enough. And let’s not forget Operation INTERFLEX, a training programme that has turned 45,000 Ukrainian troops into battlefield-ready soldiers. If only Starmer showed half as much enthusiasm for training British workers, perhaps the economy wouldn't be gasping for air. But it doesn’t end there. Britain is also co-leading a drone coalition with Latvia, because nothing says “strategic genius” like tying yourself to a military effort with a country the size of a medium-sized UK county. The Magical Money Tree: Funding War with Stolen AssetsIf you were under the quaint impression that Britain’s war contributions came from taxpayer funds, think again! Chancellor Rachel Reeves has found a new and creative way to bankroll this fiasco: using £2.26 billion from frozen Russian assets. That’s right—Britain is now in the business of repurposing seized foreign assets to fund a war. What could possibly go wrong? This clever scheme is part of the G7’s $50 billion ‘Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration’ plan, which sounds less like a responsible financial strategy and more like something a dodgy hedge fund would concoct before it collapses. Starmer and his team claim this doesn’t cost the British public a penny. How very reassuring—until, of course, Russia (or any other adversary) decides to do the same to Western assets in retaliation. Who needs long-term diplomatic credibility when you can have short-term war funding, right? Diplomatic Strategy: The Art of Prolonging WarStarmer has made it abundantly clear that his government will support Ukraine "for as long as it takes"—a phrase that conveniently sidesteps any measurable timeline or strategic objective. Unlike those pesky peace plans (such as the one proposed by Trump), Starmer is fully committed to rejecting any settlement that might involve Ukraine making territorial concessions. This stance ensures that the war continues indefinitely, all while Starmer pretends he's standing for principles rather than just throwing Britain headfirst into a geopolitical quagmire. Even on social media (or “X” as it’s now called), commentators have speculated that Starmer is keen to escalate even further—perhaps sending jets, or even troops. Of course, his official stance denies such ambitions… for now. But given how the UK has steadily ramped up involvement, who’s betting against full-blown military intervention by 2026? Sanctions: The Illusion of Economic WarfareSince 2022, the UK has sanctioned over 2,000 Russian entities, because nothing says “winning” like waging an economic war against a country that’s still trading, still selling energy, and still standing. The latest round of sanctions is aimed at squeezing Russian oil revenue and military supply chains—a noble cause, if not for the minor inconvenience that Russia has simply redirected its trade to Asia and the Middle East. Meanwhile, Britain is busy signing £181 million uranium supply deals for Ukraine to help them break free from Russian energy dependence. Because clearly, when energy bills are crippling British households, our top priority should be ensuring that Ukraine—not the UK—has a secure energy supply. EU vs. UK: Who Can Waste More Money Faster?For those who think Britain is unique in its obsession with funding this war, fear not! The EU has pledged an eye-watering €135 billion to Ukraine since 2022, with €52 billion in military aid alone. The European Peace Facility even reimburses member states for weapons sent to Ukraine—because why stop at one unsustainable military spending spree when you can have 27 countries join in? Unlike the UK, which simply throws cash at the problem, the EU at least tries to tie aid to Ukraine’s future EU integration—a policy that is bound to be a roaring success once Ukraine, an active war zone, is asked to meet stringent EU economic and governance standards. However, in one particularly bizarre twist, the EU has no clear agreement on actual troop deployments, despite Ursula von der Leyen’s fondness for the phrase “peace through strength.” Perhaps they’re waiting for Starmer to make the first move, seeing as Britain is always eager to send troops where they don’t belong. The Grand Takeaway: Britain’s War AddictionLet’s be clear: Britain’s Ukraine strategy under Starmer is not about "defending democracy" or "European security." It’s about prolonging war under the illusion of moral superiority.
And all of this at a time when the UK is struggling with real domestic crises: underfunded hospitals, rising poverty, an overstretched police force, and an energy sector on life support. But fear not—Britain stands with Ukraine for as long as it takes! What exactly "it" is remains an open question. But one thing’s for sure: whatever the outcome, Starmer will make sure Britain keeps paying for it. You're currently a free subscriber to The INFORMER. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
|
UK, EU and Canada decided to stop Trump’s peace plan for Ukraine
Monday, 3 March 2025
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment